Skip To Main Content

Schools

Translate

Community Conversation - Nichols

Thank you to all of the individuals who invested the time to engage in our Community Conversation sessions regarding the Structural Deficit Reduction Plan.

Meeting summaries were created to provide increased transparency across the community and to provide insight as to the perspectives and thoughts across various stakeholders.

The total number of participants does not include district facilitators.

Meeting details:

  • Date and time: April 15, 2025 at 6:30 p.m.
  • Location: Nichols Middle School
  • Approximate number of participants: 68

What criteria should be considered when making possible recommendations for a school to be closed or consolidated?

At this point, we are asking for your input on criteria that you believe are most valuable in future decision making around potential school closures or consolidations. To guide stakeholder discussion, criteria have been categorized into four categories. Please note that these are a starting point, not set in stone.

  • Excellence (EX): Striving for high-quality education and student outcomes

  • Equity (EQ): Ensuring access and opportunities for ALL students

  • Effective Use of Resources - Finances (FI): Maximizing financial and operational sustainability

  • Effective Use of Resources - Facilities (FA): Optimizing facilities, space, and infrastructure to best support student learning and community needs

  • Participants were encouraged to create an additional category if needed to capture criteria that may not fit in our existing categories.

Robust conversation took place across sessions and content from the meetings were summarized based on high level themes that emerged. In community and parent/caregiver advisory sessions, the responses were transcribed directly from the chart paper provided from the various groups. Identifying information has been removed and responses to question 2 are provided in summary form (not verbatim quotes).

Participants were given three stickers to vote for the criteria that they believe are most important on their groups’ chart. Those votes are reflected in the righthand column of the chart below.

category
(see above for description)

criteria # of stickers
  Walkability/transportation costs/community/safety ****
  Special ed with a commitment  
  Effect on community/perception for new residents *
  Minimize number of school closures (savings generated now vs. post re-zone  
  Prevent a "point of no return" situation - can we close and save on operating costs, or does it mean sell? *
  Current state of school  - is it high quality educationally? Equitable? Etc. *
  Prioritize academic excellence (language immersion opps) **
  What can we do to generate more revenue with current assets? **
FA / FI Building health (structural health) and maintenance needs ***
EQ Walkability  
EQ / FA / EX Ensure programs for every student - including at least one K-8 building **
EQ / FA / EX All schools have access to a continuum of services (including special education and other services) ***
EQ ADA compliance is important *
EQ Prioritizing stability of lower socio-economic status families/students ***
  How does current school capacity impact this conversation?  
FA / FI Age, size of building and expansion possibility  
EX Green space and community use of space  
EQ Walkability (greater need areas) ********
FA Capacity/balanced enrollment **
EX / EQ Class enrollment ***
FA Density  
FI / EX Get flexible with grade structure - K-2 school, 3-5, 6-8 ****
EX Keep D65 desirable *
EX Embed preschools in D65  
FA Utilization rates  
EQ / EX Programming (i.e. TWI) access and continuity **
EQ Family/student impact ******
EX Teacher and staff (paraprofessionals/direct support) impact/agency *
FA Building condition  
EQ Walkability/distance/safety **
EQ Equity impact on families ****
FI Lease (or resale) value  
FI Building new revenue generation opportunities, i.e. repurpose after closure ***
FI Cost to modernize buildings: improve student experience/attract new families  
EX

Program choice and options - focus on attracting new families

  • dual language
  • magnets
  • new parents/families want options
**
EQ Each part of Evanston has a school (walkability score) ****
FI Continue to cut nonessential admin jobs that don't have direct impact on widespread or meaningful student achievement *
FI / EQ Combine elementary and middle schools (ex: Haven( ***
FI Vote to fund schools **
EX Increase enrichment and advanced classes *
EQ Close according to neighborhood income (e.g. close in high income) *
FI Stop or pause Foster School *****
FA Current and projected enrollment **
EQ Walkability - distances and safety **
FA Condition of school building  
EQ Accessibility of building/ADA **
EQ Location of building vis-à-vis diversity of area population **
EX TWI considerations and consistency over time ***
FA Flexibility of space *
EQ Walkability **
EQ / EX Facility condition (operational and repair costs) **
FI Renting/flexible space  
FA How big is the closing school  
FA / EQ / FI / EX Possibility of K-8 ****
FA / EQ Flexibility of space  
EQ / FA Ability for closed space to be repurposed to serve community in a different way *
EQ Equity of student opportunity matters *
EQ / FA Impact of school on surrounding community  
FI Revenue generation  
FI Fiscal guardrail  
EX Special education classes at each building **
  Incomplete construction of Foster School ***
  Value of land *
  Walkability *
FI Occupancy rate after Foster opens *
FI "Very poor" or ADA compliance  
FI What requires the most repairs? **
FA Value of leasing part or whole building? *
EQ / FA Early childcare in a closed school - growth mindset *****
EQ Equity - but what does it mean? What about Latino families? *
  Will we be building a school to last? ADA accessible, solid roof, etc.  
FI Cost of repair and which buildings are well built ****
EQ Potential for K-8 or K-6 schools to maintain walkability ****
FA Under-utilization rate combined with local schools (neighborhoods) ***
  Use a building to rent for a community college *
  More meetings, ways to include community feedback, internet surveys  
EQ Ensure high quality academic and student outcomes. Equity! **
  Financially sustainable for the future  
FI What happens to the land? Future needs *
  What have we learned from prior school closures? ****
  Distance **
FA Building state/maintenance  
  Neighborhood school ******
EQ Walkability *****
EQ Neighborhood schools *****
EX Class size  
EQ ADA compliance  
EX Preserve teacher jobs  
EQ Inclusive programs - keep it LRE! *
  Future needs  
EX Diverse academics - enrichment and support  
  Least disruption - impact fewest families ****
  We love our neighborhood schools. Keep our neighborhood schools open! Thank you!  
  Keep communities together  
EX Academic performance (scores, growth) controlling for demographics ****
FA / FI What buildings are the worst off (in the worst shape) - core vs. wants/must haves vs. nice to haves *****
EX School leader performance, quality of teachers, academic ***
FA / FI Percent capacity   
FA / FI Can 6th graders stay in elementary buildings? *
EQ More integration, less segregation *****
  Future use of property **
EQ Walkability/safety (busy roads) ***
FI / FA / EQ

Cost to repair per capita/student

  • Roof
  • ADA compliance
****
FI Future-proof decisions  
EX / EQ Student/teacher ratio - excellent education for every single student ****
FI Actual buses costing  
EQ / FI  Programming (special) spread - not TWI in one school - with good enrollment *
FI Revenue potential: sale of plots, leasing, rental ***
EX Preserve teacher jobs/make D65 a great place to work  
FA Creativity in structure - K-6 or other different setups **
EQ Diversity of student population at each school *

 

Knowing that difficult decisions are required, what creative solutions do you believe should be considered as an alternative or alongside potential school closures and/or consolidations?

  • Leasing out unused space to preschools within the area and/or expand district prek into neighborhood schools
  • Bolstering special education services so there is less busing out of Evanston; and possibly the ability to bring in tuition by serving out of district kids
  • Rent out district facilities; partner with community theaters, summer camps, etc to host their activities and garner revenue
  • Raise taxes to build Foster School
  • Move prek programming into neighborhood schools
  • TWI and ACC programs could have better marketing to bring more families in; better communication about the programs offered
  • Bring community organizations or services that also serve children and families into district schools
  • Consider different grade configurations (eg K-8, K-2, 3-5)
  • Selling plots of land to build housing for families; doing so would also increase the number of families available to enroll in the district
  • Adjust job descriptions to have a commercial mindset; incentivize employees to bring revenue in the district
  • Consider different grade configuration with K-6 schools; consolidate middle schools to 7-8 grade
  • Consolidation of D65/D202 to reduce costs
  • More collective responsibility for the care of schools among families (eg janitorial services, volunteering)
  • Approach Northwestern with tangible investment opportunities (invest in certain program, fleet of purple buses (could be used by NU on weekends)
  • Rather than closing vibrant school community that is already established; can we save the money from Foster School which isn't built yet; use money for capital expenses for other schools? 
  • If walkabillity is a challenge, could there be a fundraising opportunity or donation to support such as an overpass over Green Bay?
  • Market Evanston as a destination for families (magnet programs)
  • Tap Northwestern to support in a bigger way
  • District should engage expert fundraisers; could there be a dedicated position to raise significant funds?
  • Creating more guardrails on fundraising and how funds could be spent; consider investment potential
  • Engage a professional fundraiser
  • If early childhood is moved into other buildings; could the District sell JEH which could be a desirable space for another business/organization?
  • Engage directly with families who chose to leave District 65 for private school and why? Increase outreach
  • Further reduce administrative roles; offer more aggressive performance based pay/bonuses for school and district leaders 
  • Selling properties is a nice one time injection of revenue; however, rental costs would be ongoing and coud be beneficial; could provide flexibility for the district down the road if enrollment needs change and the district needs to reopen a building
  • Empower seasoned or tenured teachers to engage in leadership opportunities to offset administrative reductions
  • Could you move King Arts into neighborhood school? Retain magnet school and neighborhood school in one space
  • Haven is down several hundred kids and could absorb Kingsley? Consider moving schools intact without losing a school or community
  • Importance for students and community to have consistency and stability; District and school board need to have a well-communicated plan, next steps, and timeline